The world of artificial intelligence is officially revolutionized. With its new models o1 and o1-mini, OpenAI now provides much more powerful answers to difficult questions in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Unlike previous versions, the new models undergo a more “thinking” process before answering questions, meaning they develop strategies, recognize their mistakes and find solutions step by step, just like a human. So how smart are o1 and o1-mini?
OpenAI o1 and o1-mini usher in a new era in artificial intelligence
These two models offer significant improvements, especially in complex subjects such as mathematics, physics, chemistry and coding. For example, in a test conducted the other day, the o1 model achieved an 83% success rate in the International Mathematics Olympiad exam.
This rate was achieved in a test where OpenAI’s previous model GPT-4o achieved only 13% success. The o1 model works like a genius not only in this area, but also on coding and scientific problems. The o1-mini, which offers great convenience especially to software developers, is faster and more affordable.
In fact, the mini model is 80% cheaper than the standard o1 model. o1-mini increases efficiency in coding problems, while allowing developers to save time by speeding up their work. This fast aspect of o1-mini has even shown successful performance in coding competitions and achieved a rank of 89% in Codeforces competitions.
It seems that both models will be a great help for researchers, engineers and developers, especially those working in the STEM field. Imagine an AI that can generate mathematical formulas in complex fields such as quantum physics , analyze cell sequence data or easily solve multi-step coding processes. This is exactly what o1 and o1-mini promise.
Although they don’t yet have features like web browsing or file uploading, it’s certain that these models will become even more capable in the future. What do you think about this? You can leave your opinions in the comments section below.
{{user}} {{datetime}}
{{text}}